Posts Tagged ‘Real Estate News’

Iowa housing market stable

Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

The Iowa Association of Realtors is reporting a glimmer of positive news in its annual 2011 Housing Trends Report, out this month.

It says home sales were up statewide in December, for the fifth consecutive month, and steady throughout 2011.

Rob Cook is a realtor for Ruhl&Ruhl REALTORS in Dubuque, a real estate blogger and self-proclaimed “numbers guy.”

He pulled statistics from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), showing Dubuque is number two in the nation when it comes to high rates of house appreciation.

Those numbers show the average home in Dubuque appreciated 2.46 percent in one year, through Sept. 2011, and 8.06 percent over the course of five years. Bismark, N.D., by the way, took top marks, with a 15.99 percent five-year average appreciation.

In Dubuque, Cook said, “our average sale price right now is about $155,000, give or take, and we’ve sold just shy of 800 homes in each of the last three years in the Dubuque city: zip codes 52001, 52002, 52003.”

A map of the US from the FHFA shows each state’s average home value appreciation over the course of 12 months, from the third quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2011.

“The whole state’s doing relatively well compared to the rest of the country,” Cook said.

Iowa is only one of four states that didn’t experience depreciating home values. The average Iowa home over the course of that period went up 1.3 percent in value, according to the FHFA. The average Nebraska house appreciated 0.5 percent, Wyoming saw a 2.9 percent increase and North Dakota came in first place, with a 5.4 percent increase.

“When you buy a house, buy a car, buy a boat, there’s always a risk that it’s going to depreciate or not appreciate like you had planned,” Cook said.

Iowa, he said, on average, has a stable housing market.

Mel Graves is a realtor with Brissey in Dubuque and secretary and treasurer of the Dubuque Board of Realtors.

He pointed out 2011 was the first year without any tax credit incentives for home buyers, “so this is a pure year, this is just market-driven,” he said.

Graves said he has noticed a slight increase in consumer confidence.

“It seems to me that people are now beginning to say, ‘I need to make that decision I’ve been holding off on, I am comfortable that my job’s going to be there, and I’m going to go ahead,’” Graves said. “That’s significant. When they can do that, then they can go ahead and make some plans.”

He said insurance rates continue to be low, which is encouraging for buyers.

The total number of home sales in Iowa for 2011 increased 0.4 percent from 2010.

Regardless of state or national housing market numbers, however, Cook suggests buyers and sellers look at their own particular market.

“They need to be fully aware of what’s going on in their market and not pay attention so much to the national news, you know, as far as, you know, both real estate thing and the economy overall,” Cook said. “It’s a factor, but, you know, it’s kind of like what they say with the realtor ads, you know, ‘All real estate is local.’”

The Iowa Association of Realtors said, as of December, the average days on the market for a house in Iowa was 112. That’s the same as it was in 2010, according to the association.

Ruhl&Ruhl REALTORS completely supports Rob’s statement and so do the numbers! Check out our latest Facts&Trends edition coming out the first week of February.  If you would like to recieve Facts&Trends please visit RuhlHomes.com.

Article provided by: KWWL.com

America’s Top 10 States For Business in 2011

Friday, January 20th, 2012

Let’s face it, in these economically trying times going to a state that is conducive for conducting business is vitally important. If you are looking for work it does not make a great deal of sense going to a state that hinders a businesses ability to succeed.

Likewise, buying a house in a good business environment makes a lot more sense than doing so where businesses will be struggling. So if you are thinking of moving to a state that is favorable for business this list by CNBC is a very smart tool to use.

Virginia came in as the top state. With it’s pro-business state house and proximity to Washington DC, where growth in government spending has created it’s own jobs engine, Virginia is for business lovers. Texas is in second place, with southern states Georgia, North Carolina, and Colorado rounding out the top 5. The only northeast member of the list Massachusetts comes in 6th owing mainly to it’s educated workforce.

The remaining states on our top 10 list are heartland states; Minnesota, Utah, Iowa, and Nebraska. The worst state in the country is Rhode Island with Alaska not far behind.

So if you are starting a business, looking for a job, or interested in investing in real estate, check out this list of the …

Top 10 States for Business in America for 2011

  1. Virginia
  2. Texas
  3. North Carolina
  4. Georgia
  5. Colorado
  6. Massachusetts 
  7. Minnesota
  8. Utah
  9. Iowa
  10. Nebraska

Keep checking RuhlHomes.com for the most up to date information on the housing market.

Originally Published by: RealEstateBloggers.com

Funds Available for Military Homebuyers in Illinois

Wednesday, January 18th, 2012

A new financing package is being offered to help all qualified Illinois veterans, active military personnel, reservists and Illinois National Guard Members with the purchase of a home.

The financing package, Welcome Home Heroes, through the Illinois Housing Development Authority provides qualified veterans or active reservists a $10,000 forgivable loan over two years for down payment and closing cost assistance, 30-year fixed rate mortgage that has an affordable interest rate and an optional mortgage credit certificate to reduce federal income tax liability.

“This is a great program that all service personnel should take advantage of,” said Jane Schneider, President of 1862 Mortgage, an IHDA approved lender offering the package. “Time is of the essence, as only $10 Million total is available.”

The Welcome Home Heroes financing package is designed to assist qualified Illinois veterans, who do not need to be first time homebuyers, and active military personnel, reservists and Illinois National Guard members, who must be first time homebuyers.  All buyers must qualify based on income and purchase price limits, and the home must be purchased as their primary residence within the state of Illinois.

 Interested buyers please contact 1862 Mortgage loan officer, McKenzie Mathews, for additional information at 309.743.8060 or McKenzie.Mathews@1862Mortgage.com.

 1862 Mortgage has partnered with Ruhl&Ruhl REALTORS to offer a convenient one-stop experience for both home buying and home financing needs nationwide. 1862 Mortgage is a DBA (Doing Business As) of Shelter Mortgage, an operating subsidiary of Guaranty Bank. As part of a strong and stable bank, 1862 Mortgage offers the promise of longevity and security along with a commitment to service excellence.

A family-owned company since 1862, Ruhl&Ruhl REALTORS annually sells nearly 3,800 homes in eastern Iowa, western Illinois and southwestern Wisconsin and is the largest privately-owned real estate company in Iowa. Headquartered in Davenport, Iowa, the company has 280 sales associates and 50 employees based in 11 sales. In addition to residential sales, Ruhl&Ruhl REALTORS offers services in relocation, new home sales, farm and land sales, senior services, real estate investment, mortgage services through 1862 Mortgage and insurance services through the Nelson Brothers Agency.  For more information on Ruhl&Ruhl REALTORS, visit their website at www.RuhlHomes.com.

One in Five Baby Boomers Gifting or Loaning Money to Children or Grandchildren to Help Buy Homes

Wednesday, December 28th, 2011

A national survey commissioned by Better Homes and Gardens® Real Estate has found that baby boomers are part of a growing trend in which they are helping their children or grandchildren become home buyers.  According to the survey, one in five baby boomers have already gifted, loaned or co-signed a loan to support their children or grandchildren in purchasing a home, and more than two-thirds of baby boomers want to provide this type of support in the future.

“With historically low interest rates and competitive listing prices, now is a great time to invest in real estate for those in a position to do so.  However, in today’s economy saving money for a down payment can be a struggle for young adults.  Baby boomers are a unique generation that has driven the economy for the past 30 years.  Our data shows that they are using what they’ve earned and what they’ve learned to invest in the future and help their children and grandchildren realize the American Dream of Homeownership”, notes Sherry Chris, CEO of Better Homes and Gardens® Real Estate, LLC.

Aside from the good investment rationale, baby boomer respondents cited that the willingness to provide financial support to their children and/or grandchildren was out of love.  By providing financial support to assist in the home buying process, respondents stated that they could ensure their children and/or grandchildren would benefit from their estate and fulfill a large part of achieving the American dream.

Key findings from the baby boomer survey include:                                              

  • One in five baby boomers have already gifted, loaned or co-signed a loan to their children or grandchildren for a down payment on a home.
  • Looking ahead, one in 10 baby boomers say they will “defiantly” provide their children or grandchildren with financial support for a down payment on a home, and at last half hope to do so.
    • In total, more than two-thirds (68%) of all baby boomers said they want to provide future financial support for their children or grandchildren to purchase a home.
    • Those who have already provided past support are also most confident that they will do so again.
    • Highest interest in providing support is reported among younger (age 45-54), more affluent (household income of $75,000+) baby boomers who have at least one adult child (age 18-34).
    • Baby boomers are driven to provide financial support primarily by their belief in the overall investment value for them and/or their children or grandchildren, and the role homeownership plays in fulfilling the American dream.
    • Older (age 55+) and more affluent ($100,000+ household income) baby boomers are more likely than their younger or less affluent counterparts to have previously provided financial support.
    • Across prior support and future interest, baby boomers show more interest in “gifting” or loaning money; they are least interested in co-signing loans.

 

Again, the importance of homeownership goes much further than the economy; it is still all about establishing and maintaining that American dream.

To read further on this topic please visit the Better Homes and Gardens® real estate blog and for the most current information on the housing market, keep checking RuhlHomes.com.

Some information and stats provided by Better Homes and Gardens®.

Is There a 3.8% Tax on Homes in the Health Bill?

Tuesday, November 15th, 2011

As the presidential debates start to heat up, there will be comments about the Administration’s Health Care Bill. We are again getting many questions about a possible 3.8% tax on home sales that some claim is in the bill. To answer these questions, we have decided to re-run a blog post we did a couple months ago.

We have received many questions about a possible 3.8% tax which will be put on home sales beginning in 2013. We want to do our best to clarify this situation for everyone. We are not accountants and give you this information just as a simple answer to the misconception. Understand that, when it comes to IRS regulations, you should check with your accountant for the most accurate and up-to-date information.

A little history on the confusion

Fact Check.org explains it this way:

The truth is that only a tiny percentage of home sellers will pay the tax. First of all, only those with incomes over $200,000 a year ($250,000 for married couples filing jointly) will be subject to it. And even for those who have such high incomes, the tax still won’t apply to the first $250,000 on profits from the sale of a personal residence — or to the first $500,000 in the case of a married couple selling their home.

We can understand how this misconception got started. The law itself is couched in highly technical language that only a qualified tax expert can fully grasp. (This provision begins on page 33 of the reconciliation bill that was passed and signed into law.) And it does say the tax falls on “net gain … attributable to the disposition of property.” That would include the sale of a home. But the bill also says the tax falls only on that portion of any gain that is “taken into account in computing taxable income” under the existing tax code. And the fact is, the first $250,000 in profit on the sale of a primary residence (or $500,000 in the case of a married couple) is excluded from taxable income already. (That exclusion doesn’t apply to vacation homes or rental properties.)

The Joint Committee on Taxation, the group of nonpartisan tax experts that Congress relies on to analyze tax proposals, underscores this in a footnote on page 135 of its report on the bill. The note states: “Gross income does not include … excluded gain from the sale of a principal residence.”

And just to be sure, we checked with William Ahern, director of policy and communications for the nonprofit, pro-business Tax Foundation. “Some home sales would see a tax increase under this bill,” Ahern told us, “but it would have to be a second home or a principal residence generating [a gain of] more than $250,000 ($500,000 for a couple).”

Simple Explanation: 

The following simple explanation comes from midiShaw:

The tax will affect those sellers of real property who will be otherwise taxed on capital gains under current tax laws. Under current laws, if you sell your primary residence and meet the ‘time ‘ criteria, you are exempt up to $250,000 or $500,000 (filing individually or jointly).  Any amount realized OVER that amount is taxable under current tax schedules based on income.  As such, this new tax will apparently be added to the current capital gains tax burden IF your income is over $200,000/$250,000 (filing individually or jointly). For those selling second homes and investment properties, the tax, once again, will be applied to the amount of gain realized.

Detailed Explanation:

The following also comes from midiShaw in a comment to the above answer.

Beginning in 2013, the national health care reform legislation that became law in March, 2010, imposes a new 3.8 percent tax on certain investment income. The new tax will apply to single filers with incomes over $200,000 and married taxpayers with incomes over $250,000. Under the law, the investment tax provisions in Chapter 2A of the Internal Revenue Code are placed under the heading “Unearned Income Medicare Contribution.” In general, this new Medicare tax will apply to investment income that is subject to income tax, which includes capital gains. Pursuant to IRC Section 1402 (C)(1)(A)(iii), the investment income to which this new tax applies includes “net gain” (to the extent taken into account in computing taxable income) attributed to the disposition of property that qualifies as a capital asset under Section 1221 (capital gains), as well as gains on other property that are considered part of ordinary income.

We offer this just as an explanation. Remember, when it comes to IRS regulations, you should check with your accountant for the most accurate and up-to-date information.

For the most up-to-date information on the housing market, continue checking RuhlHomes.com.

Partial information and quotes provided by: KCM Blog

Americans Still Believe in the Value of Homeownership

Thursday, November 10th, 2011

Last week, Fannie Mae released their National Housing Survey for the third quarter of 2011. They survey the American public on a multitude of questions concerning today’s housing market. Each quarter, we like to pull out some of the findings we deem most interesting. Here they are for the most recent report:

Most Important Reasons to Buy a Home

The study shows that the four major reasons a person buys a home have nothing to do with money. The top four reasons, in order, are:

  • It means having a good place to raise children and provide them with a good education
  • You have a physical structure where you and your family feel safe
  • It allows you to have more space for your family
  • It gives you control of what you do with your living space (renovations and updates)

When we talk about homeownership today, it seems that the financial aspects always jump to the front of the discussion. There is no doubt that families must justify a home purchase from a financial point of view today. However, the reasons they actually buy are the same reasons our parents and grandparents purchased their home – to create a better lifestyle for their families.

The Home as an Investment

Though most people purchase a home for non-financial reasons, everyone realizes there is a money component to homeownership. Here is what they said on this issue:

  • 64% of the general population (and 69% of homeowners) believe that homeownership is a ‘safe’ investment.
  • 55% believe that homeownership has more potential as an investment than any other traditional asset class.
  • 68% think that now is a good time to buy a home

Rent vs. Buy

We are always interested in the difference people see in renting vs. owning.

  • 63% of renters have aspirations to someday own their own home
  • 70% of renters think that owning is superior to renting
  • 96% of homeowners see homeownership as a positive experience (4% see it as a negative experience) while 83% of renters see renting as a positive experience (15% see it as a negative experience)
  • 97% of homeowners live in a single family residence while 53% of renters live in a multi-unit building

Bottom Line

Even in these difficult times, Americans still realize the value of homeownership both from a financial and social standpoint.

Keep checking RuhlHomes.com for more important information on the housing market.

Provided by: KCM Blog

Is the Real Estate Market a Good Return on Investment?

Tuesday, November 8th, 2011

Words can not the answer to the question above.  Only a very strong photo that was provided to us by MSN money. . .

Increasing Demand Increases Value of Farmland

Thursday, September 8th, 2011

The value of farmland is on the rise because of an increasing demand.

Although prices vary based on location and size of parcel, high-quality crop land in the Quad-Cities region and western Illinois is selling for about $8,000 to $9,000 an acre, according toDennis Stolk, of Ruhl & Ruhl’s Davenport Farm & Land division.

Mr. Stolk said prices can be found on either side of that spectrum, but spring and summer sales have been in excess of $8,000 and acre, with “several now $9,000 and over.”

That’s up from about $5,000 to $6,000 an acre a couple years ago, he said.

Iowa farmland increased from about $5,100 an acre to about $5,500 from 2006 to 2010, Shane Johnson, Quad City Area Realtor Association CEO, said.

A U.S. Department of Agriculture Land Values Summary released Aug. 4, says the median price of Illinois farmland was $5,700 an acre in 2011, up $1,680 from 2007. The median price for Iowa farmland was $5,600 an acre in 2011, up $2,230 from 2007.

There’s a “much greater demand than there is supply” of available farmland, said Tom Marcus, a Ruhl & Ruhl Realtor in the Maquoketa area who has been selling farmland for more than 35 years.

“We have very few sellers and people waiting in line to buy.”

“Wehave definitely seen a rise in price per acre of farm ground, particularly in our region,” said Craig Wainwright, owner of Wainwright Realty in Port Byron.

Farmers also are “blessed” right now with high commodity prices, so are “willing to pay more for the ground,” hesaid.

“The 2011 increase continues a string of large increases that began in 2004,” University of Illinois agriculture economist and farm management specialist Gary Schnitkey said in a press release.

The last seven-year period in which Illinois land prices increased an equivalent amount was from 1975 to 1981 when farmland jumped from$846 an acre to $2,188 an acre, he said.

Mr. Stolk said the strong market has been fueled by “good, strong farm profits, high commodity prices and low interest rates.”

“To have corn and bean prices pushing $7 and $14 (per bushel) respectively, that’s pretty positive for land values,” saidKevin Urick, president of the Henry County farm bureau and a RE/MAX real estate agent.

Mr. Urick said a speaker at a commodity conference he attended this summer said that if corn prices rise, so will the cost and value of farmland.”I think people are looking at land like gold right now.”

However, you don’t have to remind “farmers too hard that values can drop,” he said, adding that for now, “I would say they’re pretty steady.”

As the price of land rises, so does the cost for farmers who rent fields. According to the University of Illinois release, the average cash rent in Illinois was $183 an acre this year. A USDA Agricultural Land Values and Cash Rents Final Estimates report said it was $132 an acre in 2006.

According to reports on the Iowa State University Extension’s website at www.extension.iastate.edu, the average cash rent in Iowa was $214 an acre this year, up from $137 an acre in 2006.

It’s currently cheaper for farmers to own land than to rent it, Mr. Marcus, the Maquoketa area Realtor said.

For the most part, land buyers right now are other farmers. Mr. Urick said he heard at the commodities conference that roughly 70 percent of farmland buyers are farmers, and the rest are investors contemplating commercial developments.

Mr. Johnson said it’s good to see that the local real estate industry — commercial and residential –”continues to be in very good shape when compared to other economies around the nation.”

The Quad-Cities area continues “to be a good place to invest in,” he said.

“We have good stability even in the midst of a very difficult economy.”

Article Originally Published by Argus-Dispatch

Short Sales: Has Their Time Finally Arrived?

Thursday, September 1st, 2011

Last week, RealtyTrac released its Q2 2011 U.S. Foreclosure Sales Report. The report confirmed what we are hearing in the marketplace – banks are beginning to look more favorably on short sales as option to foreclosure.

The report dissected the sales of distressed properties in the second quarter of 2011. Here are several of their findings:

  • Sales of homes that were in some stage of foreclosure or bank owned accounted for 31 percent of all U.S. residential sales in the second quarter of 2011, down from nearly 36 percent of all sales in the first quarter.
  • A total of 102,407 pre-foreclosure homes (short sales) sold in the second quarter, an increase of 19 percent from the previous quarter.
  • A total of 162,680 REO homes (foreclosures) sold in the second quarter, virtually unchanged from the first quarter.
  • Short sales on average sold for a discount of 21 percentbelow the average sales price of non-foreclosure homes.
  • REOs on average sold at a discount of nearly 40 percent below the average sales price of non-foreclosure homes.

This could be a great sign that banks are finally realizing the advantages of short sales over foreclosures.

Bloomberg.com quoted Rick Sharga, senior vice president of RealtyTrac, in an article covering the report:

“This is a glimmer of hope that lenders are getting more realistic. It’s a win for borrowers who avoid foreclosure, buyers who get a house in better condition and banks that lose less money, which is also a win for taxpayers.”

Bottom Line

Banks are beginning to do more short sales. It is time for everyone involved to help in this endeavor. Tomorrow, we will have a short sale expert, Christopher Reale, blog on gaining the right mindset to do just that.

Ruhl&Ruhl Selected as a Prudential Preferred Broker

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

Ruhl&Ruhl REALTORS Relocation Department is proud to announce that Ruhl&Ruhl has been selected by Prudential Real Estate and Relocation Services as a member of their Preferred Broker Network for 2011-2012. Prudential’s commitment to their corporate clients is to utilize brokers and sales professionals who have been certified through Prudential Real Estate and Relocation Services Broker Certification program, which ensures quality service delivery to their corporate clients and transferees. Ruhl&Ruhl has many sales professionals who meet the most current Eligibility Criteria and are certified in Destination Services (working with buyers), Marketing Assistance (working with sellers) and Relocation Inventory (corporate owned homes). 

Prudential Financial, Inc. (NYSE: PRU), a financial services leader with approximately $641 billion of assets under management as of September 30, 2009, has operations in the United States, Asia, Europe, and Latin America. Prudential’s businesses offer a variety of products and services, including life insurance, annuities, retirement-related services, mutual funds, investment management, and real estate services. For more information, please visit www.news.prudential.com.

A family-owned company since 1862, Ruhl&Ruhl REALTORS annually sells nearly 3,800 homes in eastern Iowa, western Illinois and southwestern Wisconsin and is the largest privately-owned real estate company in Iowa. Headquartered in Davenport, Iowa, the company has 280 sales associates based in sales offices located in Bettendorf, Burlington, Cedar Rapids, Clinton, Coralville, Davenport, DeWitt, Dubuque, Maquoketa, and Muscatine, in Iowa, and in Moline, Illinois. In addition to residential sales, Ruhl&Ruhl offers services in relocation, new home sales, farm and land sales, senior services, real estate investment, mortgage services through 1862 Mortgage and insurance services through Nelson Ruhl Agency.  For more information on Ruhl&Ruhl, visit their website at www.RuhlHomes.com.


Copyright © 2012 Ruhl & Ruhl REALTORS. All rights reserved. Disclaimer: All content on this blog is my own opinion and should not be treated as fact or relied upon when purchasing or selling real estate.